A Clinical Risk Model for Personalized Screening and Prevention of Breast Cancer.
| dc.creator | Eriksson, Mikael; orcid: 0000-0001-8135-4270 | |
| dc.creator | Czene, Kamila; orcid: 0000-0002-3233-5695 | |
| dc.creator | Vachon, Celine | |
| dc.creator | Conant, Emily F | |
| dc.creator | Hall, Per; orcid: 0000-0002-5640-9126 | |
| dc.date | 2023-08-22T13:37:26Z | |
| dc.date | 2023-08-22T13:37:26Z | |
| dc.date | 2023-06-19 | |
| dc.date | 2023-08-22T13:37:25Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-03T01:24:58Z | |
| dc.description | BackgroundImage-derived artificial intelligence (AI) risk models have shown promise in identifying high-risk women in the short term. The long-term performance of image-derived risk models expanded with clinical factors has not been investigated.MethodsWe performed a case-cohort study of 8110 women aged 40-74 randomly selected from a Swedish mammography screening cohort initiated in 2010 together with 1661 incident BCs diagnosed before January 2022. The imaging-only AI risk model extracted mammographic features and age at screening. Additional lifestyle/familial risk factors were incorporated into the lifestyle/familial-expanded AI model. Absolute risks were calculated using the two models and the clinical Tyrer-Cuzick v8 model. Age-adjusted model performances were compared across the 10-year follow-up.ResultsThe AUCs of the lifestyle/familial-expanded AI risk model ranged from 0.75 (95%CI: 0.70-0.80) to 0.68 (95%CI: 0.66-0.69) 1-10 years after study entry. Corresponding AUCs were 0.72 (95%CI: 0.66-0.78) to 0.65 (95%CI: 0.63-0.66) for the imaging-only model and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.55-0.68) to 0.60 (95%CI: 0.58-0.61) for Tyrer-Cuzick v8. The increased performances were observed in multiple risk subgroups and cancer subtypes. Among the 5% of women at highest risk, the PPV was 5.8% using the lifestyle/familial-expanded model compared with 5.3% using the imaging-only model, p p ConclusionsThe lifestyle/familial-expanded AI risk model showed higher performance for both long-term and short-term risk assessment compared with imaging-only and Tyrer-Cuzick models. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | 2072-6694 | |
| dc.identifier | 37370856 | |
| dc.identifier | PMC10296673 | |
| dc.identifier | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/354928 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repo.dare.co.zw/handle/123456789/153607 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.source | essn: 2072-6694 | |
| dc.source | nlmid: 101526829 | |
| dc.subject | Artificial intelligence | |
| dc.subject | Breast cancer | |
| dc.subject | Primary Prevention | |
| dc.subject | Risk Model | |
| dc.subject | Long-term Risk | |
| dc.subject | Individualized Screening | |
| dc.subject | Image-derived Risk Model | |
| dc.title | A Clinical Risk Model for Personalized Screening and Prevention of Breast Cancer. | |
| dc.type | Article |