Indirect discrimination and substantive equality in Nitisha: Easier said than done under Indian constitutional jurisprudence

Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Abstract

Description

This note analyses the recent landmark case of Lt Col Nitisha v Union of India, dated 25 March 2021, where the Supreme Court of India formally recognised the concept of indirect discrimination under Articles 14 and 15(1) of the Indian Constitution. Despite the favourable outcome and conceptual leaps in acknowledging that indirect discrimination is closely tied to substantive equality, the reasoning in the judgment does not fully cohere with these conceptual insights. This note critically examines how Nitisha poses barriers to addressing indirect discrimination with a substantive equality lens, particularly because of an intent-based divide between direct and indirect discrimination, a causal requirement between the norm and disparate impact, adoption of mirror comparators and the lack of clarity on justifications.

Keywords

Case Commentaries, Indirect discrimination, substantive equality, India, constitutional law, sex, discrimination law, Supreme Court of India

Citation

URI

https://repo.dare.co.zw/handle/123456789/163433

Collections

University of Cambridge Apollo

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By